To be fair, the instinct to ban a whole group is understandable after something goes wrong. But throwing the book at everyone isn’t the answer. The sensible route is a measured one: identify individuals where possible, punish properly, and build a proper education programme for the rest.
Firm sanctions where deserved
If someone’s identifiable and has crossed clear lines, then bans are the right response. There’s no soft-pedalling for repeat offenders or serious incidents — some people should lose access to the club for life depending on what they’ve done. That’s about protecting the wider support and the matchday experience. At the same time, indiscriminate mass bans punish the innocent and breed resentment.
Education that actually means something
When people say "education", they’re not asking for a token afternoon workshop. I agree with that. The club ought to run a proper course — multiple sessions, with meaningful content about behaviour, the consequences of actions, and how supporters represent the badge. Make it club-led, not a tick-box exercise. A signed agreement after completion makes it clear: you know the rules, you accept them, and you’ll face punishment if you break the deal.
Practicalities for the UB area
For sitting in the UB area, insist on course attendance and a signed code of conduct as a condition of sale. Non-negotiable. It’s reasonable to expect higher standards in that section because of the proximity and profile. Will it be easy? No. Will it make the place safer and cleaner to be a fan? You can see why it might. Start somewhere. Enforce consistently. Educate properly. Then, when necessary, use bans — and do so decisively when individuals are clearly to blame.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
