Tav isn’t the player he was a few years back, and to be honest most of us have seen that decline over the past couple of seasons. That said, there’s a solid argument for offering him one more year on reduced terms — not as an automatic first-choice right back, but as a reliable squad option who still brings meaningful value.

Why a short, reduced deal makes sense

First off, availability is underrated. You can plan all you like, but injuries and loss of form hit every squad. Having someone who can plug into two or three positions without a panic transfer window is worth something. Tav knows the league, the dressing room and the expectations at Ibrox. That kind of experience matters to keep standards high week in, week out.

Not a starter — but not redundant either

To be clear, I wouldn’t want him guaranteed minutes. Make it a one-year deal with reduced pay and a clearly defined role. He’d be depth rather than first pick. That keeps competition for places honest and gives space for younger lads to step up. But when tactical tweaks are needed mid-game, or when injuries bite, you want someone who’s physically able and mentally switched on.

What he still brings to the squad

There’s more than just minutes. A seasoned pro passing on habits, training standards and simple game-day calm can speed up the settling-in of new signings. He’s hardly injured, still athletic, and can contribute in the final third now and then. You don’t hand out another contract for sentiment alone — but when the practical benefits line up like this, a short-term, structured solution seems sensible.

So yes, Tav has slowed. But given his durability, versatility and the dressing-room boost he offers, a carefully-worded one-year deal looks like the pragmatic option for now.

Written by Sir Walter Smith OBE: 31 May 2026

Tags: transfers tactics squad injury