We look sharper and more threatening the moment the ball is moved quickly from the back into the final third. Against Hearts that directness paid off, yet for big chunks we fell back into sideways passes around the back and beaten crosses that go nowhere. The difference is obvious and worrying.

Speed fixes a lot

To be fair, quick transitions hide a multitude of sins. When the tempo is up, opponents have less time to set and we create clearer chances. You can see why the fast attacking sequences worked; players were moving into space, finishing runs and linking with pace. But too many games we allow that build-up, comfort passing across the back, to become the default. It slows the game, invites pressure and forces our wide players to improvise when they should be supported.

Wide play and the final ball

Tavernier’s crosses were speculative for spells and that hurts us. When full-backs send hopeful balls without support, our striker ends up lonely. Chermiti looked isolated at times and needs someone close to play off. Gassama’s industry is positive but yesterday his end product was poor; plenty of energy but not enough quality in the final pass. The fix is simple in principle: fewer touches at the back, quicker passes, and more movement to offer short options. Too many touches from our back four allows the press to get organised.

VAR left a bad taste

Then there’s the VAR issue on Mm. I won’t pretend to be the rulebook, but from where I was sitting it looked clear and the decision not given left a sour mood. It’s not about conspiracies; it’s about consistency. If VAR is supposed to strip away doubt then these moments need to be handled in a way supporters can see is fair. Right now, those choices feed suspicion and distract from the football.

Truth is, intensity and a faster tempo are the answers. Keep that pressure on from minute one and we make life easier for everyone up front. Simple, but vital.

Written by Blue-Floyd3: 26 February 2026

Tags: spfl tactics transfers injury