To be fair, the quick jump to "mentality" after a loss has become almost reflexive. Plenty of supporters want an explanation and mentality is an easy one, but it's lazy thinking. This feels like a game where personnel and tactics did the talking, not some inherent character flaw across everyone we've signed.


A new squad and a new manager changes everything

We can't pretend this is the same group that finished last season. There's been turnover and a managerial change, and that brings different instincts and priorities. If only a handful of the starting XI were carryovers from last year, you can see why cohesion might lag. New signings need time to gel. A new coach has new instructions. That’s football — not an indictment of every player’s mentality.


Tactics beat temperament on the day

Motherwell deserved credit. They set up well, took the game to us in the right areas and looked more comfortable with their plan. When an opponent out-thinks you, players look disjointed even if they’re trying hard. It’s not about missing heart; it’s about being out of shape, outnumbered in key moments, and on the back foot tactically. You can be committed and still be tactically second-best.


Don’t let history become a self-fulfilling prophecy

Yes, history matters for context, but assuming we’ll re-run past mistakes no matter who we sign or who’s in the dugout is defeatist. If we bring in a raft of new players in the summer, they won’t automatically inherit last season’s outcomes. Teams evolve. Managers adapt. Supporters should judge performance on what’s happening now, not as if yesterday’s rainfall guarantees a storm tomorrow.

Look, criticism is valid — everyone wants better — but let’s not reduce complex defeats to a simple character flaw. Tactical choices, squad turnover and individual quality all play a part. Motherwell ran the better game this time. That’s an answer we can analyse and try to fix, not a moral judgement to hang over every new face at Ibrox.

Written by RohlWithCheese: 25 June 2026