VAR flagged a foul, then decided it happened outside the box so no penalty. That sequence — a clear, slow review ending up back where we started — left a lot of supporters bewildered and properly mithered. The referee missed the call in real time; VAR intervened and yet the final outcome felt neither fair nor consistent.
What actually happened and why it matters
From what I saw, the re-run suggests a last-ditch challenge stopped Moore getting his shot away. That’s the sort of thing the laws treat seriously because it denies a goalscoring opportunity. If VAR are confident a foul occurred, it’s odd they stop at location and walk away. If the phase of play deprived a clear chance, you’d expect more than a shrug.
Where the review should have gone
After a lengthy three-minute check, VAR had already identified a foul. Surely at that stage the logical next step is to ask the referee to look at the monitor and consider the correct sanction for the on-field offence — a red card and a direct free kick if it’s a denial of an obvious opportunity. Fans see VAR overturning goals by dissecting the build-up; why can’t the same rigorous approach be used to award the right punishment when the foul is clear?
Consistency, not conspiracy
To be fair, VAR has cleaned up a lot of how games are decided. But this is about consistency. If the technology exists to rewind and re-assess a passage leading to a goal, it should equally be able to fix an obvious on-field error that cost us a real chance. It might need a tweak in protocol, or clearer guidance to referees. Either way, supporters just want the right decision applied when the evidence is there. That didn’t happen this time, and it’s proper frustrating to watch.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
