Let’s be blunt from the off: this isn’t about choosing flair over graft. It’s about squad balance. If Barron were to move on, bringing in someone like Devlin — a proper, combative midfielder who can close games down and add bite — makes a lot of sense. You can want Connor to stay. I do too. But you also need players who’ll do the dirty work when fixtures pile up.

Why the all-action type matters

Clubs that play in Europe and juggle extra matches need bodies who can shore things up. That isn’t glamorous. It rarely shows up in highlight reels. But having a midfielder who can press, scrap and break up the opposition at crucial moments changes tight games. To be fair, we still need creative midfielders. No one’s saying Devlin would suddenly start unlocking defences. This is about control, tempo management and protecting a lead when legs are tiring.

Connor isn’t easily replaced — but we need options

Connor brings a particular mix of energy and forward thrust. If he stays, brilliant. If he doesn’t, you can see why the club would look for someone similar in spirit, even if not identical in style. Devlin is the sort of lad who will roll his sleeves up. He offers a different quality to the squad: grit, commitment and the kind of presence that lets more creative types breathe and do their job.

Pragmatism over romance

Football is often about pragmatism. If Barron leaves and the club can bring in a ready-made, combative midfielder without breaking the bank, that’s sensible business. We shouldn’t pretend he’s the creative solution — he isn’t — but having a player like that on the bench or in the starting XI at the right times is useful. To anyone worrying about style, remember: balance wins long seasons. Give me someone who’ll fight for the cause as well as the players who'll create the chances.

Written by Tomthumb05: 26 July 2026

Tags: transfers