If the club are chasing Fergie, Raskin looks the likeliest to go — but selling Chermiti now would be short-sighted. His value and influence should rise if we keep him for a second season.

Raskin feels like the sacrificial lamb

From where I'm sitting, Raskin is the one who makes the most sense to move on if funds are needed. He's got profile, there will be interest and you can see why the club might cash in. Aasgaard won't be short of offers either, despite what some think of him. There's always noise in the summer — fans shouting opinions, others convinced nothing will happen — but you can't ignore the practical side. Rangers have to balance the books and try to improve the squad at the same time.

Chermiti is the one I would keep

I really don't want to see Chermiti sold. We've had this pattern of moving breakout forwards quickly and it can feel like we're short-changing the team and the player. The second season is often when a striker truly shows what he is; confidence grows, opposition respects you more and new runs open up. Chermiti already looks different to anything else in the league — he's a handful, unpredictable in a good way. Letting him go now risks losing out on that natural progression, and his value is only likely to climb if he stays and keeps producing.

Fergie: 50/50, but worth a try

As for Fergie, I'm 50/50. It will come down to him and the other offers he's got. Nobody can say with certainty what's happening, despite how loudly some claim otherwise. If there's smoke there might be fire, and this rumour wouldn't have lasted so long if there wasn't something to it. I just hope the right messages are going his way from back home — and that he remembers what playing for Rangers means to a lot of us. If the club can find a way to improve the squad without gutting our future, take it. But selling Chermiti to fund a signing would feel like a step backwards.

Written by MrRangers1987: 22 July 2026

Tags: transfers rumours