Point is straightforward: you can't pick and choose who to punish and pretend you're defending the supporters. Ordinary fans get stitched up when clubs act with double standards, and that frustration is real.
Why this rankles
Look, nobody's defending troublemakers. If groups are causing problems they should be dealt with. But there's a difference between proper policing and what looks like selective enforcement. When one set of supporters is publicly shamed while another is quietly allowed back in, people smell favouritism. That doesn't sit well with anyone who pays for a ticket and just wants to watch their team.
The innocent always pay
What rings true in the original post is the point about ordinary fans getting caught in the crossfire. Families, youngsters, those who travel in good faith — they're the ones who miss out when clubs and boards take headline-grabbing decisions. You can see why season-ticket holders and neutral observers get fed up. It feels like club politics, not supporter safety, is shaping the response.
What we'd like to see
Be fair, be consistent. If measures are necessary for safety, they should be applied transparently and to everyone involved. No excuses, no winks and nods. Supporters want clarity, not spin. To be honest, that simple consistency would calm a lot of people down — and that has to be better for football than posturing.
At the end of the day, fans are the heartbeat of the game. Punish those who deserve it, but don't make ordinary supporters pay because of mixed messaging from the top.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
