Tavernier on the right?

To be fair, you can see the argument for getting James Tavernier on the park more often. He brings a certain attacking edge — width, deliveries and a habit of getting himself into the right areas. That mattered against Motherwell and it could matter again over the next few fixtures.

Why he helps our attack

Anyone watching will tell you Tavernier gives us a clear outlet on the right. He pins wingers back, stretches defences and provides a reliable set-piece option. Those deliveries from corners and free kicks aren't just pretty; they create real chances. Yes, he can frustrate at times, but there are few in the squad who can deliver balls into the box with the same consistency. When games are tight, that sort of quality can swing results.

Defensive trade-offs to consider

That said, we must be honest about the balance. If he’s pushed up the pitch Sterling is the better option defensively at right back, so you accept a possible vulnerability down that flank. It becomes a question of what Danny opts for: protection at the back or more threat in the final third. Against teams who sit deep or rely on wide attacks, you can see why a more defensively solid full-back is tempting.

Where should he play?

My take? Use Tavernier as a specialist option when we need width and set-piece quality. Start him higher up the right when we want to dominate possession and force crosses into the box. If the match requires a tighter defensive shape, play Sterling at right back and bring James off the bench to change the game. DR’s reluctance to use Antman or Skov Olsen on that side makes a case for it — if we’re short of genuine right-sided attacking options, why not get the best delivery in?

Interested to hear other people’s takes. Do we sacrifice a bit at the back for the better chance of goals? I’d lean towards getting his quality on the pitch when the tie is close. Simple as that.

Written by SounessesMowzer: 28 June 2026