Straight to the point: you build with two players for every position, and that logic says Rangers need six central midfielders. It isn't glamour talk — it's about cover for rotations, suspensions, knocks and tactical tweaks across a long season.
Depth matters. We all know how quickly fixtures pile up, especially if you’re juggling cups and the league. One or two players injured and suddenly you're down a body in the centre. Managers rotate to keep legs fresh. Sometimes you want a different shape for a specific opponent. Having a realistic six-man group gives the manager options without throwing youngsters in too early or forcing players out of position.
Now, about Aasgaard and Bajrami. The idea they’ll automatically slot into the heart of midfield all season feels optimistic. I'm not saying they can't cover there, but the suggestion they're going to be primary central options is a stretch. Fans can hope, of course — but hoping isn’t the same as planning. You need specialists and reliable rotation pieces who are used to that role.
And Curtis — the player's priority is clear. If he wants game time, he won't hang around on the bench forever. We've seen pros move on when football time dries up. That’s football. It’s practical, not dramatic. If Rangers want to keep him, they need to make sure he sees a path to minutes; if not, expect him to look elsewhere.
Look, it’s fine to argue different opinions — that’s what these boards are for. But squad planning should be pragmatic. Two players per position isn't sexy, but it's sensible. You can call it conservative, but it makes sense when results and continuity matter. If we want stability through a long season, the midfield group needs numbers, variety and players who actually play that role week in, week out.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
