Let’s be blunt — spending big on one name when the squad needs work across the park is a gamble I’m not willing to back. You can make arguments for Moore, but the price tag some are quoting doesn’t stack up against what we actually got from him this season.

First off, the Spurs angle is worth a mention because it illustrates how the Premier League market works. Clubs up there often drag their feet on decisions until the season is done and will give fringe players another run in pre-season. Nothing new there. It doesn’t mean Rangers should rush to meet an inflated valuation just because an EPL club might want to cash in.

Value for money matters. If a player has contributed five goals in a season, you have to ask if a big lump sum is the sensible way to address multiple issues in the squad. We need depth, competition and probably a few different profiles in attack and midfield. Spending £20m on a single man leaves less room to reinforce other positions that are crying out for attention.

Call it common sense: spread the risk. I’d prefer the summer budget to be used on several signings who each offer something real rather than one headline purchase. Sima and Cerny are players I’d bring back ahead of Moore in my book — Sima in particular gave us more end product for less outlay. And yes, people pointed to Tillman’s debut season and his 18 goals when questioning value; that debate about pricing isn’t new.

Truth is, Rangers need a surgical summer, not a blockbuster for the sake of it. Smart business, sensible recruitment and getting the balance right across the squad will do more for our season than splashing out on one player who hasn’t yet proven he’s worth such a premium.

Written by RohlWithCheese: 28 April 2026

Tags: transfers