Put simply: if you don't fancy a player any more, that doesn't give the club licence to accept less for him. I've seen the argument pop up again and again — a section of fans feel a man's become stale, gone off him, or needs a fresh challenge, so people say the club should just sell for a reduced price. That logic doesn't stack up.
Why market value matters more than feeling
Football transfers are not decided on the strength of opinion on the Kop. Other clubs look at form, age, contract length, resale potential and how a player fits their shape. If they think he helps them, they'll put money on the table. Our own supporters might be fed up, but another club could see opportunity. It happens all the time.
Fans and value are different beasts
There's a difference between wanting a fresh start for someone and believing he's worthless. Wanting the best for the club means negotiating the best deal possible. A big fee can fund replacements, youth development, or strengthen another area of the squad. Handing a player away cheaply just because he's fallen out of favour is short-term thinking.
Keep perspective — and let the club do its job
To be fair, frustration from the terraces is understandable. We all want the team improving and want certain players out of the way. But the transfer market doesn't care about who claps when a man walks out of Ibrox. If another side values him, they'll pay. And if we think a player can help elsewhere, why not take the best price and move on? Simple football economics, really. We expect other clubs to do the same for our players — so let the board and recruitment lads handle valuations and deals, while we keep the banter for matchday.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
