There are supporters who’ve pushed Raskin into near-legend territory while others can’t understand why Lundstram doesn’t get the same love. To be fair, that gulf in feeling says more about us than the men themselves.
Why Lundstram still gets the benefit of the doubt
Lots of fans value grit, timing and obvious impact. Lundstram rolled up his sleeves, put in readable shifts and produced performances people remember — the kind of nights supporters still talk about. He looked like someone who knew his role and did it without needing his name in lights. That steadiness is something fans cling to; consistency wins affection in the stands, even if it isn’t flashy.
Why Raskin polarises the fanbase
Raskin is one of those players who splits opinion because he plays differently. Some see creativity and moments that change a game. Others see a player who does his own thing, drifts from the plan and rubs managers up the wrong way. Add a few fallouts or off-field stories — real or exaggerated — and the narrative hardens. The truth is, when someone looks brilliant sporadically, fans either elevate them or tear them down.
Putting it in perspective
We shouldn’t pretend it’s purely objective. Emotions, timing and memory matter. A big European night or a penalty that almost went our way will stick in the throat and colour how we judge players for years. Likewise, a steady pro who quietly does the job will earn loyalty from those who value team-first displays.
So yes, there’s a gulf in how people view Lundstram and Raskin. But calling one a hero and the other a serial loser simplifies things too far. Both had moments that drove the crowd wild and moments that frustrated. Fans will keep arguing — and that’s part of the club’s voice. If nothing else, it tells you how much we care.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
