Quick summary: the numbers make a tidy case for Olsen over Moore, but there’s more to the debate than percentages. Plenty of supporters will swoon over potential and big-money signings. Others, rightly in my view, want progress without pouring cash into players who might not fit or rediscover form. I’d rather see one of our own given a go — Findlay Curtis is the alternative on the table.
The numbers aren’t lying — but they don’t tell the whole story
On pure stats, Olsen comes out ahead. Better goal conversion, an extra assist, higher accuracy in opposition half passing, fewer big chances missed, cleaner crossing numbers, lower turnovers and stronger success in ground duels. Those are tidy indicators for a player who is reclaiming rhythm.
Moore’s figures don’t look as sharp: lower conversion, more big chances missed, higher turnover numbers and fewer duels won. Yet we all know numbers sit beside context — age, league, team shape, how often he’s asked to drop deep or beat a man. Fans will always debate potential value versus current output: Moore might command a fee in the mid-teens, whereas Olsen is framed as a cheaper, more pragmatic option.
Fans, feeling and the bums-on-seats factor
Truth is, supporters buy into narratives. A flashy signing or a name that excites will get bodies in seats. But that doesn’t always translate to better football on the park. Playing the percentages — picking a player because his metrics fit the system — often wins more games than signing for headline appeal.
I’m not arguing for cold spreadsheets only. I’m saying balance matters. If the choice is between two external signings who both carry questions, why not back your own and save the transfer fee?
Why Findlay Curtis deserves a look
Player C, Findlay Curtis, ticks different boxes. His goal conversion is lower and the assist number modest, but his passing into the opposition half, crossing accuracy and duel success are respectable. He turns the ball over less than Moore and offers a middle ground between raw potential and regained form.
Crucially, Curtis costs the club no transfer fee and gives the manager a home-grown option to develop within the team’s shape. For me, that’s the sensible path: give one of our own a chance, see how he adapts to a full season, and avoid rushing into a purchase that may not solve the actual problems.
Call it cautious optimism. I’d back the academy lad over splashing on two external projects when only one might work out. Rangers fans want success now, but we shouldn’t forget the upside of trusting our own.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
