Referees and officials would make fewer glaring calls if they actually followed a clear process, not gut reactions. That's my takeaway from listening to the debates — process matters more than personality.
Process beats personality
To be fair, you can hear good bits in the way decisions are talked through. When the people in charge follow a structure, explanations land better and outcomes feel less arbitrary. Trouble is, that only happens now and again. Too often it sounds like someone reaching for a conclusion then trying to dress it up afterwards.
Mental checklists would help
Why not have a simple mental checklist? Step through the facts, confirm the inputs, state the possible outcomes and explain the reasoning. It doesn't need to be a lecture — just a clear sequence so everyone can follow the logic. You'd get more consistent decisions and fewer head-scratching moments on the terraces.
Fans need substance, not shouting
Fans want to hear something that sounds like a process, not a fan shouting for a call. Even if the current system isn't changing, how it's presented can. If officials communicate a brief, methodical process it shows there's substance behind the call. Right now it often feels like instinct or bias, and that breeds frustration.
Call me old-fashioned, but I want decisions to come with a short, sensible explanation. It makes football stop feeling chaotic. Cat's out of the bag with whatever system we're using now, so at least make the most of it — and for everyone's sake, stick to the process.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
