Allowing a section of the support to sing about the IRA for the entire match is not something that sits well. It sends the wrong message to casual fans, families and anyone who wants the club to be better than that. Yes, getting rid of sectarian chants is a big ask. But shrugging and treating atmosphere as a get-out clause makes it look like the club tolerates it.


Why silence feels like acceptance

When the club does not clearly and publicly condemn behaviour that many consider sectarian, it creates a perception problem. People notice what is tolerated as much as what is punished. You can see why the club worries about rocking the boat and losing ticket revenue. But there is a difference between preserving atmosphere and allowing actions that alienate the wider community and give rivals talking points. Supporters want the club to defend its values, not just its balance sheet.


Responsibility lies with the club and stewards

It is the club that sets standards and enforces them through matchday operations, stewarding and clear public language. Fans expect consistent responses. That might mean clearer announcements, better steward action or sanctions where behaviour crosses the line. To be fair, policing chant culture is messy and nuanced. Still, consistency matters. Mixed messages from the top only make it harder for decent fans who are worn down by repetition and excuses.


What supporters can do

Good fans have to keep the pressure up. Call out unacceptable behaviour, report incidents to stewards, and make it plain that goodwill acts from groups like the UB cannot be used as a shield for sectarian chanting. If the UB or any other group want to be part of the club’s story they should be held to the same standards as everyone else. Ultimately change comes from supporters and the club acting together. If enough decent people make their voices heard, the club will have to respond.

Written by Angus1812: 22 May 2026