Look, this is simple for a lot of us. The idea of Nayshame returning is a red flag. Even if the club are blind to the fallout, the man knows what heat his name brings. For supporters still raw from that period, bringing him in now would feel like the board are out of touch — again.
Why it matters beyond just a name
It isn’t just about one appointment. It’s about pattern and respect. Fans remember when decisions were made that ignored the mood at Ibrox, and we don’t want a repeat. You can argue plenty of coaches could do the job, so why pick someone who carries baggage that distracts from the squad? McInnes has dug himself some trust with the support; risking that for a controversial hire would be hard to justify.
That press conference still hurts
People keep saying he did what any of us might have done for his career, and there’s truth in that. Plenty left for better prospects — McGregor and Davis among them — and you can’t fault ambition. But the difference is how you behave when the club and the fans are hurting. Holding that press conference and choosing your words then left a mark. Repentance now is something, but for many it won’t erase what happened on the night.
What McInnes and the board should weigh up
At the end of the day this is about judgement. If the appointment brings more noise than help, it’s the wrong call. Managers need to pick people who aid the squad and soothe the dressing room, not rattle it. To be fair, recognising a past mistake is a start, but that doesn’t automatically mean a warm welcome back. Fans have long memories. Loyalty has to be earned again — not assumed.
Related Articles
About Rangers News Views
Rangers News Views offers daily Glasgow Rangers coverage including match reaction, transfer analysis, SPFL context, tactical breakdowns and opinion-led articles written by supporters for supporters.
