To be blunt: claiming Chermiti is worth a 20–30 million payday feels wildly optimistic. Eleven goals in the SPL is solid, but it isn’t the same as being a proven international or lighting up Europe. If we’re realistic, recouping our fee or making a modest profit on a player who hasn’t delivered on the big stage yet is the sensible call.


Value versus hype is where this all starts. Fans remember Matt O'Riley’s run and Bassey’s Europa League nights — those were players who grabbed the eye on a bigger platform. O'Riley’s international status and a sustained period of output made clubs pay up. Bassey’s European displays did the same for him. Chermiti, rightly loved by some, hasn’t had that same, obvious proof. Lots of noise has been made about big fees, but hype doesn’t equal market value.


Market realities are harsh. If a British or European side truly thought a player was worth nine million-plus, you’d expect them to be actively chasing it. Scouts are everywhere these days; loans, deal structures and add-ons are common. That doesn’t mean we should sell for pennies, but neither should we invent interest where there’s little real evidence. We’ve all seen transfer fees blown up before — comparing our strikers to someone like Oli McBurnie’s inflated price does nobody any favours.


So what should the club do? Hold firm for a reasonable offer or accept a deal that gets us our money back and maybe a small profit. That’s not selling ourselves short; it’s sensible asset management. If a genuine bidder appears with a fair valuation, take the call. If not, keep the player, back him to improve, and let him earn a higher price later. Truth is, supporters want the best for the club and for the player — but we also need the board to be clear-eyed about value.

At the end of the day, it’s fine to back Chermiti. It’s also fine to call out the nonsense when numbers are tossed about without substance. Fans like Teddyblue asking hard questions aren’t being negative; they’re being realistic.

Written by Jackboy55: 10 June 2026